Friday, April 13
Harris misses a few important things, and, given the state of things, it's not very surprising that the tip-off is a cursory dismissal of 300 - predictably as a piece of comic book violence that somewhat mystifyingly interested audiences more than GRINDHOUSE did. In the article, as in almost any critical discussion of Tarantino, the theme turns instead on a comparison between what the director is currently up to and PULP FICTION - his signal achievement, and clearly an important if arguably overrated film.
Though no one
expected or, as far as I can tell, today believes that PULP FICTION really was
about much of anything, it reinforced a kind of optimism about American popular
culture that was very fitting to the post-Cold War, post-Rising Sun '90s.
Typically, it was one of the first films that benefited greatly from
internet-generated word of "mouth" (word of hand?). GRINDHOUSE comes at a vastly different
cultural moment. One of the reasons that audiences, even and especially
the much-derided but evidently quite sizeable 300 audience, have rejected it
is, in my opinion, that it is so self-consciously not about anything other than
meaningless violence.
Those who refuse to accept that 300 was a
message movie as much or more than it was an ode to "bloody
comic-book violence" are perhaps less likely to understand that, in these
times, cultural expressions that make moral sense of warfare fill a need,
a pressing and deeply felt need. (You don't necessarily have to accept the
themes to acknowledge their attractiveness.) Meanwhile, seemingly
everywhere else in the mass media, in politics, at school, all of the real
violence in the real world is portrayed as at best senseless, at worst "our fault." For a young man told everywhere he goes that he and
those like him are in the wrong, 300 must have been like a sip of water to
someone dying of thirst.
In that sense, GRINDHOUSE offers more of the
cultural same - more empty self-hatred, more cynicism, more senselessness, more evil
white men in a universe where redemption comes only by the heroism of the cultural other. In contrast to GRINDHOUSE, and contrary to
the hype, the violence in 300 is rather antiseptic, especially in comparison to
what might have done with the same subject matter. More important, it
remains subservient to the theme of bravery, unity, integrity, and sacrifice
for a greater good, one that is emphatically not separate from or counter to
democratic civic values. That's a message which Hollywood, with only
occasional exceptions, has largely given up on, or completely forgotten how to
tell.
Posted by: CKMacLeod at
05:17:11
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 453 words, total size 4 kb.
22 queries taking 0.0105 seconds, 17 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.